Agree on done.
Pick a useful slice of work. Define the desired behavior, what is outside scope, and how we will check the result.
A little less chasing.
A lot more making.
The team brings a way of working, not just a place to send tasks. We keep the context, checks, and feedback connected to the change.
Find your first project ↗The problem.
The context.
The final call.
Your priorities, repository access, and a person who can make product and merge decisions.
The implementation.
The second read.
The follow-through.
A team that builds, checks, revises, and brings you evidence you can assess.
See the handoff.
Step by step.
The process includes the follow-through:
checks, independent review, corrections,
and a clear decision for you.
A feature crosses repositories? The workflow keeps dependent work, integration checks, and review together.
Set up once.
Work with context.
Getting the foundations right
makes the next task clearer.
Connect the essentials.
Prepare the code, dependencies, tools, and communication channels needed for the job. Access follows the work.
Make the standards shared.
Capture your coding conventions, check commands, and review expectations so every teammate works from the same context.
A good working
relationship.
What does getting started involve?+
We start with a conversation about a concrete piece of work. Together we define the scope, connect the repositories and tools it needs, prepare the working environment, and agree on review expectations. The team’s process is already in place; setup makes it fit your project.
Can you work on an existing codebase?+
Yes. The team starts with your repository, its conventions, and the issue at hand. Access, dependencies, and the ability to run or verify the project are part of setup. We establish those requirements before implementation begins.
How do we communicate?+
You can work with the team in connected Slack conversations, by email, or through Wallfacer. Assigned GitHub issues can start implementation, and pull requests keep the code review close to the change. We agree on the channels during setup.
Who approves the changes?+
A person approves changes headed to your default branch. The agents implement, check, independently review, and revise the work first. On a larger project, reviewed pieces can come together on an integration branch before the complete change reaches you.
What happens when a reviewer finds a problem?+
The findings go back to the implementation task. The engineer updates the change, addresses the feedback, and brings the revision back for review. If a question needs your judgment, the team brings you the context and a recommendation.
Can a project span several repositories?+
Yes. The workflow can coordinate dependent issues across repositories, assemble the changes, check that the interfaces agree, and establish the order they need to ship. You review the complete work with that context attached.
Can we start with something small?+
Absolutely. A well-scoped bug fix or feature is a useful first project. It gives us a concrete outcome to agree on and gives you a chance to see the team’s implementation, communication, and review process in practice.
Start with one thing.
See how we work.
One useful project. A clear outcome.
Let’s work out what comes next.